Showing posts with label Parliamentary Oral Answer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Parliamentary Oral Answer. Show all posts

Friday, 3 July 2015

Right to Buy – Parliamentary Oral Answer

John Cryer (Leyton and Wanstead) (Lab): Does the Secretary of State expect the replacement of housing association homes that are sold off to be the same as, above or below the rate for council homes previously sold off?

Greg Clark: As my hon. Friend the Minister for Housing and Planning made clear, the requirement will be one-for-one replacement. With regard to council house sales, replacement of more than one for one has already been achieved for the first year.

Wednesday, 16 April 2014

Private Rented Sector – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Mr Adrian Sanders (Torbay) (LD): What steps the Government are taking to
reform the private rented sector. 
Kris Hopkins: We are making significant reforms to the private rented
sector. These include increasing supply through the £1 billion Build to Rent fund and £10 billion guarantee scheme, and providing £6.7 million to address rogue landlords.
Mr Sanders: The regulatory regime for private sector housing will go some way to protecting tenants, but also give investors in rented housing the confidence and security to invest. Will he provide an update on the consultation process and confirm that additional protections for landlords and tenants could be included if a well streamlined form of regulation could be found?
Kris Hopkins: First, may I reassure my hon. Friend that the £1 billion Build to Rent fund is over-subscribed by £2.8 billion? There is a confidence to participate in that, but it is right that the Government ensure that we protect both landlords and tenants. There is a redress scheme that will become law soon and a tenants charter, and we are really encouraging councils to go out there and pursue those rogue landlords, a small number of individuals, who are undermining this part of the sector.

Rent-a-Room Scheme – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Tim Loughton (East Worthing and Shoreham) (Con): What discussions he has
had with the Chancellor of the Exchequer on increasing the amount of housing
accommodation by extending the scope and level of the rent-a-room scheme.
Kris Hopkins: I meet ministerial colleagues regularly to discuss the
Government’s policy on housing. The rent-a-room scheme allows hard-working
householders to earn an additional £4,250 a year tax free. The average yearly rent for a lodger is below this threshold at £4,168.

Thursday, 16 January 2014

Discretionary Housing Payments – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Dr Thérèse Coffey (Suffolk Coastal) (Con): What assessment he has made of recent trends in the award of discretionary housing payments. 

Iain Duncan Smith: Figures published in December show that in the first half of the financial year 2013-14 the average committed spend by local authorities was 40% of their allocated budget. Against those who had said that they were overspending, in fact it turns out that the vast majority are not.

Universal Credit – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Steve Rotheram (Liverpool, Walton) (Lab): What his most recent estimate is of the number of people who will be claiming universal credit by April 2014.

Mr Iain Duncan Smith: Based on caseload projections, we expect more than 6,000 claimants from the pathfinders to be on universal credit in January. Beyond the pathfinder scheme and in the live running of universal credit, we are also rolling out other components, such as the claimant commitment. Jobcentre Plus advisers have agreed around 120,000 JSA claimant commitments, rising by some 30,000 each week. That continues our progressive approach to date, enabling a safe and successful delivery.

Thursday, 12 December 2013

Social Housing – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Sir Andrew Stunell (Hazel Grove) (LD): What fiscal steps the Government are taking to encourage the building of social housing.
The Chief Secretary to the Treasury (Danny Alexander): I pay tribute to my right hon. Friend for his contribution on the housing issue while a Minister in the CLG, particularly on helping to ensure that the £4.5 billion affordable homes programme is on track to deliver 170,000 new affordable homes by March 2015—100,000 are completed so far—and to fund an extra 165,000 houses over three years from 2015.
Sir Andrew Stunell: That is a remarkable contrast with Labour’s disgraceful approach, which got rid of those houses. Will my right hon. Friend assure me that highly successful arm’s length management organisations, such as Stockport Homes, which just opened the 4 millionth social home in the housing stock, will have an opportunity, under the Chancellor’s proposals, to build more social housing to meet the urgent need of my constituents?
Danny Alexander: My hon. Friend is absolutely right, and I congratulate Stockport Homes on its success—I think it was recently voted one of the best landlords in the country. The 4 millionth social home was part of the Government’s commitment to reverse the trend under Labour, where the social housing stock in this country fell by 421,000. Over the term of our housing plan, we will build at least 315,000 new social homes, and he will also have noted that in the autumn statement we announced an increase of £300 million in headroom under the housing revenue account precisely to allow local authorities to build more social homes in this country.

Tuesday, 22 October 2013

Housing: Under-occupancy Charge – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Lord Best (CB): My Lords, in relation to the evidence that the Minister mentions, can he give us an update on the consultation with me and others that he promised when noble Lords rejected the so-called bedroom tax repeatedly and firmly? When will that research programme be the subject of consultation with us? When is it likely to be concluded? Will he accept the evidence if it shows that what he calls the “scare stories” turn out to be true and that a good deal of disruption and hardship is caused by this measure?
Lord Freud: My Lords, as the noble Lord knows, an elaborate programme of research is going on around this measure and will take place over a two-year period. Regular reports will be provided. I believe that the first interim reports are coming out in the spring. I will, of course, be pleased to talk to the noble Lord about the research and will give a great deal of attention to what we find. If there are concerns, we will match them. As noble Lords will know, we have made changes to the discretionary housing payments system this year to reflect some of the early concerns that have developed and we have found an extra £35 million for that.

Friday, 14 June 2013

Council Borrowing – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Caroline Lucas (Brighton, Pavilion) (Green): If the Government are serious about increasing housing supply, will they look again at lifting the current cap on council borrowing for house building, and at providing direct capital spending to allow councils to build a mass programme of affordable housing?

Mr Foster: We are looking at the point the hon. Lady has raised, and an announcement will be made on 26 June.

Wednesday, 22 May 2013

Housing Benefit Cap (Evictions) – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Barry Gardiner (Brent North) (Lab): What redress is available to tenants whose landlords seek to evict them on the grounds that they are housing benefit recipients subject to the benefits cap.
Iain Duncan Smith: Landlords must support their tenants in maintaining their tenancy. All those affected by the cap have already been contacted, most of them more than a year ago, so tenants uncertain about their situation should have asked for a review by now, to check that they are receiving all the benefits to which they are entitled. The local authority may consider paying
discretionary housing payments, which we have already given them, in negotiations with the landlord, to find a way to avoid eviction.

Barry Gardiner: The Secretary of State is precisely avoiding the point. He knows very well that landlords are using as an excuse for getting rid of tenants, and as a reason to evict them, the fact that they are on the benefits cap. He said that the benefits cap would be a way of bringing rents down, but it is not; it is a way of evicting tenants who are living on benefits. That is appalling, and he needs to do something about it.
Mr Duncan Smith: On the implementation of the cap, people have had over a year to work on this, and I know that local authorities are working with them; we keep in constant contact with them. We will have given local authorities more than £380 million in discretionary moneys. It is very clear that if the issue is only the cap, there is no requirement for people to be evicted. This is a reality, and authorities must work with them.

Wednesday, 20 March 2013

Universal Credit – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Baroness Lister of Burtersett: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether universal credit recipients who are paid with a simple payment card will be allowed to withdraw only part of their monthly or twice-monthly universal credit payment if they so choose.
Lord Freud: The simple payment card will allow users to withdraw the whole amount (and not part) of each benefit payment at the same time, up to a daily limit of £600. Universal credit recipients who want to withdraw only part of their monthly or twice-monthly universal credit payment will need to use a transactional bank account.


Friday, 15 February 2013

Housing – Parliamentary Oral Question

Lord Bassam of Brighton: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether their social housing underoccupancy measures will apply to separated parents who have shared care arrangements and have been allocated an extra bedroom as a result.
Lord Freud: The underoccupancy measure does apply to separated parents who have shared care arrangements in both the private and social rented sectors. Blanket exemptions are not the most effective or affordable approach to targeting resources. We have however made sure that those likely to be affected will be able to get the support and advice that they need. There are a number of options available to those affected including, for those that already undertake some work, increasing their hours, or alternatively finding work.

Bedroom Tax – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Ms Harriet Harman (Camberwell and Peckham) (Lab): The bedroom tax is going to hit people all around the country. It is bad enough in my borough of Southwark, but even worse in the Deputy Prime Minister’s city of Sheffield, where 5,027 people will be hit. This is not a policy to tackle under-occupation because these people cannot move, and they have no choice but to pay. That is why it is called the bedroom tax. People only get housing benefit if they are on a low income. Will he admit to the House that this is deeply unfair and will make people on low incomes worse off?
The Deputy Prime Minister: The problem that the right hon. and learned Lady cannot duck is that 1.8 million households are waiting to get on to social housing provision and 1 million bedrooms are standing empty. It does not make sense to have a benefits system that continues to support this mismatch between people needing places to live and empty bedrooms, and that is what we are trying to address. As with so many things in the reform of welfare, why were there no reforms of any meaningful description under Labour yet now Labour Members baulk at every single tough decision that we must take?

Tuesday, 29 January 2013

Housing Benefit – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Mr Stephen Hepburn (Jarrow) (Lab): What assessment he has made of the potential effect on low-income families of planned changes to housing benefit eligibility in respect of under-occupancy in the social rented sector.
Steve Webb: Our impact assessment shows that of the 3.4 million social sector tenants receiving housing benefit, up to 660,000 could potentially be affected by this measure.

Thursday, 1 November 2012

Housing – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Baroness King of Bow: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many (1) local authority, and (2) housing association tenants in each London Borough have been sent letters encouraging them to exercise their right to buy their homes.
Baroness Hanham: The Government are determined that tenants who are eligible to exercise the right to buy their home and are able to afford it should be made aware of the significantly increased discount of up to £75,000 now available. In order to protect tenants' personal data, the department was rightly not able to use personal address data supplied by local authorities and housing associations to mail tenants directly. The contractor therefore used other database information to help target potential eligible tenants, as is the norm for direct mail marketing. Landlords have a statutory duty to inform their tenants about the changes. However, the department's research on previous changes to the scheme suggested that only a third of tenants were aware of those changes. It would be unfair if some tenants were not able to exercise their legal right to buy because of local councils keeping them in the dark and failing to promote the reinvigorated scheme.

Rough Sleepers – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Lord Rogan: My Lords, statistics show that a higher proportion of ex-service personnel are sleeping rough compared with the population as a whole. Will the Government take urgent steps to address that problem?
Baroness Hanham: My Lords, the statistics are that 4% of those people sleeping rough are from the Armed Forces. My right honourable friend Grant Shapps, when he was Minister for Housing in the previous Parliament, had already made it clear that those from the Armed Forces absolutely received top priority. We are very aware of that problem. However, as I say, the figure is as low as four in one hundred.

Tuesday, 2 October 2012

Bedroom Tax – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Natascha Engel (North East Derbyshire) (Lab): The bedroom tax is forcing many people to apply for much smaller council houses. What is the Department doing to ensure that local authorities such as North East Derbyshire have the money to build smaller homes?
Mr Prisk: We are of course, together with others, putting some £19.5 billion into the affordable housing programme. However, we need to bear in mind the other side of the coin, namely people who face overcrowding while others live on their own in three or four-bedroom properties. I have no problem with the new size criteria; indeed, there are choices, such as taking in a lodger, that could actually help people to maintain their property.


Friday, 6 July 2012

Armed Forces (Housing) – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Rebecca Harris (Castle Point) (Con) and others: What recent steps he has taken to support former members of the armed forces in respect of housing.
Grant Shapps: I am determined to help current and former members of the armed forces gain the housing they deserve. I have given service personnel priority for the Government’s affordable home ownership schemes, including Firstbuy, and on Friday last week I issued new statutory guidance to make it easier for service personnel to get access to affordable homes for rent.
Henry Smith: I am pleased to hear that that guidance is coming forward because my local housing authority has up till now seemed to be confused about where it stands in relation to the military covenant and its obligations under it.
Grant Shapps: I am grateful to my hon. Friend for giving me the opportunity to explain to the House that that new guidance makes it clear to his and every other local authority that this nonsense of people returning, often without a base back in this country because of the amount of time they have served overseas, and then not being able to apply for housing in their area because of some trumped-up allegation that they have no locality—in other words, that they do not have a residency requirement —is to end. That is what the guidance makes absolutely clear.

Friday, 29 June 2012

Spare Rooms – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Emma Reynolds (Wolverhampton North East) (Lab): Many of my constituents have raised concerns with me about the forthcoming bedroom tax, especially given the lack of affordable alternative housing in Wolverhampton. Specifically, can the Secretary of State reassure me that individuals or families with disabilities who are in adapted housing, and who have waited some time to secure it, will not be subject to reductions in their housing benefit as of April next year?
Chris Grayling: We have ensured that local authorities have a substantial amount of money in discretionary funds to take into account the kind of situation that the hon. Lady describes, but the reality is that in the social rented sector we have about 1 million spare rooms, and at a time when people are queuing up on waiting lists throughout the country, it makes no sense for the taxpayer to pay for that.

Friday, 18 May 2012

Green Deal – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Amber Rudd (Hastings and Rye) (Con): What progress his Department has made on the introduction of the green deal.
The Minister of State, Department of Energy and Climate Change (Gregory Barker): The green deal is a flagship policy for the coalition. We are making good progress towards the introduction of the green deal this autumn. We are determined to have a solid framework in place for this transformational scheme, which will enable the green deal market to grow right through to the next decade and beyond.

Thursday, 3 November 2011

Pay to Stay – Parliamentary Oral Answer

Mr John Leech (Manchester, Withington) (LD): Will the Minister ensure that the revenue raised by pay to stay is ring-fenced for social housing?
Grant Shapps: I can provide a little more information. We expect some tens of millions of pounds to be raised by pay to stay. Those with six-figure incomes will pay a market rent to stay in their homes, and we will use every single penny of the money to build the more affordable housing that the most vulnerable people in society deserve and need.

Julie Elliott (Sunderland Central) (Lab): Does the £100,000 to which the question refers constitute household or individual income?
Grant Shapps: It constitutes the income of a household consisting of two partners.