An attempt to overturn a bedroom tax decision on human
rights grounds has failed because of discretionary housing payments. The upper
tribunal refused an appeal against a cut to a claimant’s housing benefit under
the bedroom tax policy. The appeal was brought by a tenant who is the sole
occupant of a two-bedroom home. His second bedroom is used a few days of the
week by his 14-year-old son, who lives with his mother for the remainder of the
time. The tenant argued that article 8 of the Human Rights Convention of Human
Rights should have been taken into account by a first-tier tribunal, which
upheld the council’s decision. The upper tribunal judge found that the
first-tier tribunal’s decision was ‘erroneous in law’, as it did not give
adequate consideration to the human right argument. However, he found that the
error was ‘not material’ to its decision to refuse the appeal. Read more on
Inside Housing.
The crimewave sweeping Britain? Illegal houses in multiple occupation |
Aditya Chakrabortty
-
With private-sector villainy and public-sector complicity, what makes this
HMO scandal so characteristic of modern Britain is how far the guilt spreads
F...
11 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment