An attempt to overturn a bedroom tax decision on human
rights grounds has failed because of discretionary housing payments. The upper
tribunal refused an appeal against a cut to a claimant’s housing benefit under
the bedroom tax policy. The appeal was brought by a tenant who is the sole
occupant of a two-bedroom home. His second bedroom is used a few days of the
week by his 14-year-old son, who lives with his mother for the remainder of the
time. The tenant argued that article 8 of the Human Rights Convention of Human
Rights should have been taken into account by a first-tier tribunal, which
upheld the council’s decision. The upper tribunal judge found that the
first-tier tribunal’s decision was ‘erroneous in law’, as it did not give
adequate consideration to the human right argument. However, he found that the
error was ‘not material’ to its decision to refuse the appeal. Read more on
Inside Housing.
The Guardian view on animal welfare: a timely reminder that cruelty is
wrong | Editorial
-
New protections for hares, and more humane conditions on farms, should be
welcomed by all
Looking after wildlife and improving the lives of farm animals ...
3 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment