When the government first announced plans to build
100,000 ‘Starter Homes’ a year ago, we welcomed the commitment to get more land
released for building homes, and to use the value created to make these homes
more affordable than the market otherwise would. We felt that building some
homes for sale to first time buyers at a 20% discount on the market price could
be a useful addition to overall supply – as long as this was actually additional
supply and didn’t replace genuinely affordable homes in the process. So we
hoped that the government would listen to our concerns and drop the idea that
this new form of housing could be paid for by scrapping the requirements on
developers to build genuinely affordable homes – known as Section 106
agreements. Read more on the Shelter blog.
The Guardian view on unhealthy Britain: from housing to junk food, there
are solutions | Editorial
-
People are living with sickness or disability younger than a decade ago.
That should shock the country and prompt action
The two-year decline in healthy ...
5 hours ago

No comments:
Post a Comment