The government’s “bedroom tax” discriminates unlawfully
against some disabled people who need an extra bedroom because of their
impairment, but not against others, the Supreme Court has ruled. The Supreme
Court ruled that ministers’ decision to apply the bedroom tax to disabled
people who need an extra bedroom for a clear medical reason, and to families
who need an additional bedroom for a disabled child who requires overnight care,
was unlawful discrimination. But other disabled people who need an extra
bedroom for impairment-related reasons lost their battle against having to pay
the bedroom tax, after the court ruled in favour of the DWP. Read more on the
Disability News Service website.
Rachel Reeves to confirm changes to ‘outdated’ planning system
-
Changes intended to reduce ‘burdensome bureaucracy’ and make it easier to
build windfarms, reservoirs and housing
Ministers are making it easier to build...
12 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment