Housing providers are frantically working out ways to
support tenants and protect revenue streams ahead of the introduction of the
bedroom tax next April – which will see working-age social tenants
under-occupying homes by one or more rooms hit by housing benefit cuts. Now the Department for Work and Pensions
(DWP) is set to leave out the definition of a bedroom from the final
regulations, leaving it to providers to classify bedroom numbers in homes –
with the rent charged reflecting size and the number of bedrooms. It’s widely acknowledged – by the Government
itself – that there are huge stock mismatches across the country, thus
providers are exploring ways to support tenants in their homes. But in doing so, it appears the elderly –
exempt from the under-occupation cuts (for now) – and the homeless could be put
at risk as smaller homes are prioritised for bedroom tax “victims”. Downsizing
schemes run successfully by housing providers – focusing on helping the elderly
downsize from larger unmanageable homes – will have to be stopped because the
smaller homes will need to be prioritised for working age claimants who can’t
afford to stay where they are. So, the sector can no longer afford to help
those that want to move, but is forced to move those that don’t want to leave
where they are. Read more on 24dash.
‘Immigration limbo’ left Bikram Lama homeless before he died in Hyde park.
Calls are growing for change
-
Alliance of 48 councils across Australia issue damning statement calling
for more support for people in ‘immigration limbo’, joining growing chorus
- ...
1 day ago

No comments:
Post a Comment