skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Iain Duncan Smith has been warned by his own advisers that a
vital element of his flagship bill to simplify the benefits system is
"unworkable and unfair". Plans
to force part-time workers to seek greater hours of employment or risk losing
their benefits have been condemned as unrealistic at a time of prolonged
recession by the social security advisory committee. The committee has focused its criticisms on
the pressures that will be brought to bear on Britain's burgeoning part-time
workforce. The government's proposals would affect anyone earning less than
they would in a 35-hour-a-week job on the minimum wage. Part-time workers could
lose money for not applying sufficiently frequently for vacancies, not
attending job interviews for a better paid job within 48 hours of being
directed by a jobcentre, or not taking up a full-time job within 90 minutes
from home – although the government says each case will be assessed on its
merits. The committee condemned the plan
as "unrealistic in the current economic climate", adding: "With
high underemployment – currently over one million part-time workers in the UK
want to work more hours – sanctioning clients who cannot increase their hours seems
to be both unworkable and unfair. We
cannot see how in-work sanctions can be policed and are concerned that
customers working short hours may be penalised as a result of labour market
conditions, rather than as a result of their response to the conditionality
regime applicable to them." Read
more on the Observer website.

No comments:
Post a Comment