At the Labour conference, shadow chancellor Ed Balls called
for 100,000 more affordable homes to be built.
An apparent constraint on building affordable homes is the dire state of
the public finances. Yet in this current spending round the government will
spend £100 billion in this area. The problem is that 95 per cent of it will go
on Housing Benefit and just 5 per cent on building badly needed homes. Part of
the answer is to allow local councils with strong balance sheets to borrow
against their housing assets to finance new affordable house building. But we also need to drive a shift from
current to capital spending over the medium term – reversing the shift from
housing capital to housing benefit. In a recently published report, “Together
at home: A new strategy for housing”, the Institute for Public Policy Research
(IPPR) has suggested a way this could be done, by also embracing a radical
localism. The centre-piece would be a
long term strategy to decentralise power and responsibility for housing
expenditure to local areas – perhaps local government – with a remit for
meeting local housing need, including by increasing housing supply. If Labour
was to be really bold and radical on housing, this is an idea it should be
taking up. Download a copy of the report
from the IPPR website.
There’s no point building homes that people can’t afford | Letters
-
Readers respond to Polly Toynbee’s article about the tussle between central
government and local planners in Kent
Polly Toynbee’s piece misses the centra...
1 day ago
No comments:
Post a Comment