skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The government's under-occupation penalty, known to many as
the bedroom tax, was brought in under the banner that it would tackle
overcrowding and bring down the benefits bill. Yet when you look closely at the
realities of this one-size-fits all policy, the rhetoric starts to unravel. It
won't save the taxpayer money or solve the housing crisis. And it will
disproportionately affect the north of England. According to the government's own data,
families with a spare room outnumber overcrowded families by three to one in
the north of England.
If the point of the bedroom tax is to solve the problem of overcrowding,
thousands will be hit by the bedroom tax despite there being no local need for
them to move. Take Redcar and Cleveland in the
north-east as an example. Local housing association Coast & Country has
1,800 households who are currently under-occupying their properties and looking
for a smaller home, but they only have two one-bedroom homes available on their
books which these people could move into. If these residents moved into smaller
privately rented homes it would cost the taxpayer an extra £470,000 a year.
Read more on the Guardian website.
No comments:
Post a Comment