Senior judges have rejected an attempt to challenge the
lawfulness of the benefits cap , a central plank of government's welfare
policy. Lawyers acting for three families affected by the cap had argued that
it unlawfully discriminates against children and women, particularly those
affected by domestic violence. The
claimants' lawyers described the cap as a "cruel and arbitrary"
policy that would trap vulnerable women in violent relationships, and would
reduce capped household income to a level that would make it impossible for
parents to provide adequate food, clothing and other essentials for their
children. But two high court judges dismissed the claim for a judicial review,
ruling that although the cap may be seen by some to be "too
parsimonious" it was consistent with a "broad political concept of
fairness" outlined by the secretary of state for work and pensions. Read
more on the Guardian website.
John Judge obituary
-
As chief quantity surveyor at Manchester city council, my father, John
Judge, who has died aged 91, was part of a team that led the city’s
housebuilding ...
8 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment