The principles behind Universal Credit need defending –
otherwise we risk being left with the worst of both worlds. While UC strengthens work incentives for
some, other groups are not so well off in all circumstances. Families with
children would hit a ceiling where, despite working more hours, steep
withdrawal of benefits leads to a flat-lining or even a decline in disposable
income after childcare costs. In some cases, families would be worse off
working full-time than part-time. Many of the design and implementation issues
can be solved. But, despite the often-sound principles behind UC, to make a
real difference it needs to be linked to industrial and labour market policy to
address the barriers that prevent some people from moving out of benefits and
into work. This includes the prevalence of low low-paid, insecure jobs, a lack
of affordable childcare, insufficient skills and discrimination against some
groups in the labour market. Joining up UC to these other vital areas of policy
would help it to succeed and encourage the support that it needs from across
government. Read more on the Joseph Rowntree Foundation website.
Britain’s building standards are now so bad, even the super-rich are facing
housing misery | Phineas Harper
-
Residents of the UK’s most expensive flats have won a court case over
defective pipework. If their homes are shoddily built, what hope do the
rest of us ...
8 hours ago

No comments:
Post a Comment