The problem with selling publicly owned assets is that
after they are sold, they are gone forever. The commitment to extend the Right to Buy to housing
association tenants will distract from the central problem of a shortage of
homes, not solve it. Only in a country that fetishizes property ownership could
political justification for the plan come on grounds of democratic fulfilment.
An economic rationale is harder to find. About 36 per cent of right-to-buy
properties in London are now in the hands of private landlords. They, in turn,
often benefit from housing benefit payments. So quite what the advantage is for
the taxpayer from footing the bill for the discounts offered, only to then end
up subsidising private landlords, is unclear. Read more on the Huffington Post
website.
There’s no point building homes that people can’t afford | Letters
-
Readers respond to Polly Toynbee’s article about the tussle between central
government and local planners in Kent
Polly Toynbee’s piece misses the centra...
1 day ago
No comments:
Post a Comment