The government is preparing to regulate to prevent social
landlords offering lifetime tenancies. This would mean that new tenants could
only be offered a home for a period of five years or so. Very short-term
tenancies make sense if stock is limited and you want to regularly check that
it is only housing those who genuinely need it most urgently. There also seems
to be a less charitable view in some quarters that, if social housing is an
emergency safety net, life shouldn’t be too comfortable. Imposing fixed term tenancies could also cynically be
seen as a further attempt to ensure that the positive features of social
housing – first affordability, now security – are diluted to the point where
the tenure becomes too diminished to be worth defending. The affordable council
home for life eventually becoming a folk memory, along with outdoor loos and
milk delivered to your doorstep. Read more on the Shelter blog.
There’s no point building homes that people can’t afford | Letters
-
Readers respond to Polly Toynbee’s article about the tussle between central
government and local planners in Kent
Polly Toynbee’s piece misses the centra...
13 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment