When the government first announced plans to build
100,000 ‘Starter Homes’ a year ago, we welcomed the commitment to get more land
released for building homes, and to use the value created to make these homes
more affordable than the market otherwise would. We felt that building some
homes for sale to first time buyers at a 20% discount on the market price could
be a useful addition to overall supply – as long as this was actually additional
supply and didn’t replace genuinely affordable homes in the process. So we
hoped that the government would listen to our concerns and drop the idea that
this new form of housing could be paid for by scrapping the requirements on
developers to build genuinely affordable homes – known as Section 106
agreements. Read more on the Shelter blog.
There’s no point building homes that people can’t afford | Letters
-
Readers respond to Polly Toynbee’s article about the tussle between central
government and local planners in Kent
Polly Toynbee’s piece misses the centra...
1 day ago
No comments:
Post a Comment