Peers have backed the Homelessness Reduction Bill but
used the debate to set out concerns over the effect of wider government policy
on housing. In the second reading peers voted through the bill but several expressed
doubts over whether £61m of funding announced by the government for councils
over two years would cover the full costs of the extra responsibilities they
will face from the bill. Liberal Democrat peer Baroness Olly Grender questioned
the accuracy of the CLG rough sleeping figures, which have previously been
criticised by the UK Statistics Authority. Read more on Inside Housing.
There’s no point building homes that people can’t afford | Letters
-
Readers respond to Polly Toynbee’s article about the tussle between central
government and local planners in Kent
Polly Toynbee’s piece misses the centra...
1 day ago
No comments:
Post a Comment