The Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) has slammed some
recent Value for Money (VfM) reports from providers as “less than transparent”
in either lacking targets or being defined “vague, generic” objectives. In a
report on the reports, RSH says some providers have not met the requirements of
the new Standard first time and need to improve. “It is essential that boards
and executives ask themselves the right questions to ensure that their
organisation’s assets and resources – including those subsidised by the
taxpayer – are used efficiently and effectively,” said RSH Fiona MacGregor. Download the report from the RSH website.
There’s no point building homes that people can’t afford | Letters
-
Readers respond to Polly Toynbee’s article about the tussle between central
government and local planners in Kent
Polly Toynbee’s piece misses the centra...
23 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment