The Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) has slammed some
recent Value for Money (VfM) reports from providers as “less than transparent”
in either lacking targets or being defined “vague, generic” objectives. In a
report on the reports, RSH says some providers have not met the requirements of
the new Standard first time and need to improve. “It is essential that boards
and executives ask themselves the right questions to ensure that their
organisation’s assets and resources – including those subsidised by the
taxpayer – are used efficiently and effectively,” said RSH Fiona MacGregor. Download the report from the RSH website.
Heat-pump homes put less strain on grid than expected, study shows
-
Analysis of new-builds in Birmingham suggests all-electric homes not only
use less energy but vary in peak usage
Some of the first homes in the UK design...
2 days ago
No comments:
Post a Comment