The Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) has slammed some
recent Value for Money (VfM) reports from providers as “less than transparent”
in either lacking targets or being defined “vague, generic” objectives. In a
report on the reports, RSH says some providers have not met the requirements of
the new Standard first time and need to improve. “It is essential that boards
and executives ask themselves the right questions to ensure that their
organisation’s assets and resources – including those subsidised by the
taxpayer – are used efficiently and effectively,” said RSH Fiona MacGregor. Download the report from the RSH website.
‘Casual brutality’: playwright Amy Jephta on Cape Town and shared histories
of land ownership
-
The writer of A Good House explains how her new play explores notions of
belonging, suburban living and community politics
*Playwright, screenwriter and ...
19 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment