A council has blamed government benefit restrictions for its decision to evict a family with three children from temporary accommodation after they were unable to attend a viewing for a home more than 180 miles away. Waltham Forest Council stated that it had a “duty to taxpayers” over the decision to end the temporary accommodation it was providing for the family in Lewisham. The council had a duty to house the family, but in June it issued a private sector discharge offer for a home in Stoke-on-Trent. But the family said they were unable to attend a viewing because the father had just started a new job in London. Read more on Inside Housing.
Polls open in Clacton, where Farage spent more than £10,000 in byelection
against Count Binface – as it happened
-
The Reform UK leader resigned as the MP for Clacton at the start of July
and forced a byelection
The number of patients in England being cared for in hos...
11 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment