Providing the homeless with a place to live may seem like
a high cost for taxpayers. But the alternative, it turns out, is more costly,
new research shows. Subsidized accommodation could actually be a bargain for
the public, in purely economic terms. That's because living on the street
exposes men and women to higher health risks, so they're more likely to use
expensive hospital services. Moreover, the homeless tend to get arrested more
often than the rest of the population, which generates additional expense in
the criminal justice system. The research looked at Moore Place, an
85-apartment building that opened in Charlotte, North Carolina, in early 2012.
The University of North Carolina Charlotte tracked a group of homeless a year
before entering the facility, and then a year afterwards, and recorded a
dramatic drop in health care use and jail time. Total hospital bills fell from $2.5 million before to
$760,000 afterwards, while the number of E.R. visits dropped from 571 to 124.
Likewise, there was a 78% reduction in arrests and an 84% fall in jail stays.
Read more on the Fastcoexist website.
Those who defend nature against Labour’s growth agenda are not ‘traitors’ |
Letter
-
The environment is not a barrier to growth, or an internet meme, says *Sally
Hayns* in response to the government’s social media post based on the
popula...
11 hours ago

No comments:
Post a Comment