The landlord responsible for overseeing the Grenfell Tower refurbishment only discussed the “cost” and “appearance” of aluminium composite cladding (ACM) with the project’s designers, rather than its fire performance. In reference to the decision-making process around the type of cladding to be used on the building, David Gibson, previous head of capital investment at Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation (KCTMO), told the inquiry: “The discussions we were having were: what does it look like, is it acceptable for planners and what’s the cost?” He added: “Discussions weren’t any further than that because we weren’t expecting to be offered anything that might not be compliant.” Read more on Inside Housing.
Approval of east London datacentre labelled ‘slap in the face’ for local
democracy
-
Campaigners decry Angela Rayner’s backing for Brick Lane project that has
only 11 affordable homes
A £500m redevelopment of the Truman Brewery estate in ...
1 day ago
No comments:
Post a Comment